Archive for the ‘Reviews’ Category

Weety Weow! The comics of John Miller

Tuesday, August 13th, 2013

img042

Earlier this year I purchased two volumes in the series The Collected John G. Miller, both generous A4 paperback comic books published by Braw Books. I used to publish John Miller‘s work in the pages of Fast Fiction in the 1980s and 1990s, but I realise I didn’t do him any favours by reducing his work to A5 scale, nor through the patchy printing. All that is rectified by these handsomely produced books, probably using digital scanning to render the precise edges of Miller’s hard lines as clear as a stencil, and produce areas of solid flat black that would make a zebra proud. The publisher Rob Miller has done an excellent and sympathetic job in presenting John Miller’s work. He writes: “Knowing John for the past 7 years it became quite clear he’s probably our most important underground/outsider artist and the opportunity to access his ‘Archives of Doom’ was too good to pass up, keeping it all strictly ‘no-frills’ and just letting the work speak for itself.”

There are numerous reasons why I like John Miller’s unusual and imaginative work. First of all the visual energy that sparks off the page is remarkable. I suppose you’d have to be blind not to notice this the second you pick up the book. Stars, circles, zigzags, flames and other dazzling shapes leap about the panels and cause astonishing op-art effects. If you weren’t blind before, you will be soon. These visuals create near-hallucinogenic sensations in the reader. Miller draws everything using this hard-edged, heavily stylised method; figures, faces, backgrounds and visual effects are all as one to him, resulting in dense, hermetic panels that yield their secrets as obstinately as a rusty cold water tap.

img041

Next we’ve got the far-out and mind-blowing content. Without doubt, Miller has been influenced by his childhood comic reading (Marvel Comics, The Eagle, etc.), and we’ve got plenty of science fiction or eerie supernatural tales in the mould of any great Alan Class reprint. Likewise, his coarsely humourous strips have all the slapstick wildness of DC Thompson or Odhams comics from the 1960s, with the violence and invective taken up several notches for contemporary adult readers. However, these themes are just the starting point for stories where Miller can let his unhinged view of the world run free. At his best, he can create stories that sap your sense of reality. Stories such as “Ghostman Versus The Evil of the Ghost Train” or “Renegade X Android Smasher” are fractured narratives which freely mix up the characters’ reality, fantasy, and memories, in strange time-travelling episodes; there is no distinction drawn between what a character thinks/imagines/remembers, and what is “actually” happening. Readers of Philip K. Dick will appreciate this and have hours of fun with these dimension-switching experiences.

img043

Here’s some other reasons why I like John Miller:

Use of local dialect. Dialogue spoken in heavy Glaswegian accents, rich with local slang, all rendered phonetically. Not enough comics do this, if you ask me. The Broons and Oor Wullie used to be fiercely Scots, but even their dialogue was watered down in later reprints and remade into more intelligible English for the benefit of us Sassenachs. Miller wisely refuses this genteel “quaint-ifying” process.

img045

Strong female characters. The Gasworks Girls are a trio of scary anarchist free spirits who enjoy destroying property, getting as drunk as possible, and exhibiting a healthy contempt for all authority figures. The Associates sang of the “Party Fears Two”, but they had nothing on these harpies. Also The Girl With The Flowery Trousers (Suzy), who finds herself in many inexplicable surrealist situations; and Frosty, an impossibly beautiful and near-silent female who is nothing short of a mystic apparition in the midst of mundanity. Even in the science-fiction action stories, you’ll find it’s the women characters who initiate most of the action, and the men are clumsy or impotent bystanders.

img046

img047

Angular lettering. His lettering is as much a part of the page as the drawing, adding to the general aesthetic of hard-edgery where every single element appears to have been snipped out of sheet metal. With those angled capital E and O letters, Miller adds another layer of spikiness to each panel.

Zooty The Cat. This grinning feline should be instantly admitted to the pantheon of Great Comic Cats. A trickster figure, the Fool of the Tarot deck. Appears freely in any story he chooses, whether associated with the characters or not, and he always outsmarts the human race.

img044

These observations above refer to the 1980-1989 volume (with the red cover), but I also have a copy of the 1990-1999 volume which contains one of my favourite John Miller stories of all time. It’s called “It Was The Day Of The Lizard Man”, and is one of the most affecting and uncanny stories I have read anywhere. Every time I read it, or even just think about it, it makes me shudder.

Love is Power: Eze Chimalio’s Monomono-Banza Diaries Vol. 1

Saturday, March 31st, 2012


I’ve gotten about halfway through reading Monomono-Banza Diaries Vol. 1 (DARK WINDOW PRESS) by Eze Chimalio. I’m still waiting for the story to begin. But this strange 347-book doesn’t follow any of the conventions of comics, graphic novels, story-telling, or even normal prose and literature. Instead, it works to an open-ended, free-ranging and very fluid structure, enabling the artist to introduce multiple characters, multiple viewpoints, and multiple storylines. A character may appear for 3 or 4 panels, speak their piece, and vanish again – or possibly reappear 50 pages later in a quite different setting. Chimalio structures his book as a series of short vignettes, sometimes introduced by a lengthy caption which takes up the top third of the panel, a stream of baffling prose which may or may not relate to the events which unfold for the next 14-15 images. Other than that, you’ve got no breaks, no chapter headings, no captions which explain where we are or what’s going on, no beginning-middle-and-end structure, in short nothing that would help orient the reader the way a conventional graphic novel might attempt to do. Chimalio’s first achievement, then, is a liberation of story-telling from the bonds of common sense, in favour of a poetic, personal, stream-of-consciousness mode of writing. I’m hardly surprised to learn that my old friend is also an avant-garde jazz musician; this book is as close as I’ve seen to expressing free improvisation in panel form.

This isn’t to suggest Chimalio’s diaries constitute an impenetrable wodge of automatic writing. Keep reading, and the patterns and themes subtly begin to emerge. There are at least three primal themes I’ve found so far: sex, God, and money. As a matter of fact two of these themes are set out in the very first panel of the book; “What makes a man think of God and sex at the same time? His death perhaps?” The sex themes are expressed in sets of remarkably candid and outspoken confessionals, and this is where the personal “diary” form that Chimalio has chosen really comes into its own. The complexities and contradictions of religious belief are not so much explored as deftly highlighted, showing the doubts and puzzles associated with faith. As to money, in Chimalio’s world it’s inextricably linked with politics and power, and the business-suited figures which loom into view and dominate certain panels are in all probability steeped in corruption, openly serving their own interests. We see people from all strata of society, including politicians, businessmen, and religious leaders; men, women, children, babies; poor people existing at the brink of starvation, and rich people travelling in planes or limousines. Their figures and their faces fill each panel, sumptuously drawn with Chimalio’s sinuous and juicy linework. Backgrounds are peremptory at best; we might get a few lines suggesting a mountain, the interior of a vehicle, or a barren landscape with a single tree. Mostly he prefers leave the background white and empty, and concentrate on what he’s clearly interested in – people. This blank background strategy is one of the tools that enables the fluid motion of the mini-stories, the mosaic structure; the eye passes from one panel to the next unencumbered by superfluous detail, and thus we travel freely in space and time.

As I said, Chimalio is interested chiefly in the people he draws, almost compulsively repeating their faces across panel after panel, paying close attention to their eyes, but also the bone structure and muscular twitches of their faces. What pleasing abstract shapes and lines he finds, as these inscrutable souls shift their expressions slightly. As an artist, Chimalio is also much stronger on body-language than I recall from his Paraffin books of the 1990s. When we see a framed top-half of a figure, it’s the arms that are doing most of the talking, making big expressive gestures that communicate inner meaning. Even the most casual flip through the pages, in fact, will reveal a lot of hugging, touching, and intimate hand gestures between people, expressing warmth, love, urgent tactile messages.

This brings us to Chimalio’s secret weapon. In this book, he’s a mind reader. You will need to pay close attention to the word balloons and the thought balloons. In Chimalio’s simple set-ups, there is always this striking contrast between what the characters are saying, and what they are thinking. In some cases, a politician or religious figure is swiftly exposed as a fraud or a hypocrite. In others, relationships between men and women are revealed as fraught and complex networks of misunderstandings, failed communications, and clashes of imperatives. In still other cases, the conflict between speech and thought is even more ambiguous, and from their encounters human beings emerge as near-mystical, utterly unpredictable in their eccentricity. Chimalio’s achievement here is to peel people apart and leave them open; nothing is spared from his razor-sharp X-ray vision. Yet the operation is not malevolent, and performed with tremendous compassion and subtlety. The artist’s intention is not to satirise, make us laugh at his characters or hold them in contempt, but simply to see them for what they are.

If I have to find fault with this unusual and singular book, I would observe that there’s not quite enough action going on to sustain my interest for its length. It’s poetic, charming, and mysterious, but it’s still fundamentally a talking-heads comic. The characters do a lot of talking and a lot of thinking, but not much else. The reader’s eye seizes on small details like figures walking, travelling, drinking from a glass, climbing into a bathtub, simply because they provide welcome relief from the intense scenes of verbal and non-verbal communication. However, that’s the beauty of this book, and if you can adjust your comic-reading expectations accordingly, you’re in for a strange and wonderful time.